The executive order was filed July 11 with the Oklahoma Secretary of State’s Office.
A task force report commissioned by Gov. Kevin Stitt after he signed a series of anti-abortion bills into law is drawing fire.
The report, issued Wednesday by the governor’s Helping Every Life and Parent Task Force, offered a series of recommendations, from increasing Medicaid coverage for mothers to using the internet to promote “the Oklahoma life and parenting brand.”
The recommendations come from an 11-member panel Stitt created by executive order in July after he signed legislation that banned abortions in the state in most circumstances.
“I am impressed and grateful for the HELP Task Force’s dedication and execution of their responsibility to deliver thoughtful recommendations to support Oklahoma families and women before, during, and after childbirth,” Stitt said in a media release Wednesday.
People are also reading…
But some of the recommendations are being criticized by an area Planned Parenthood chapter and physicians.
A Planned Parenthood Great Plains official knocked the report for its emphasis on building the state’s brand.
“When you remove a person’s fundamental right to access abortion care and your first solution is to use state resources to ‘brand better,’ then it’s clear you’re the one with an image problem,” said Emily Wales, Planned Parenthood Great Plains president and chief executive officer.
“These recommendations affirm what we know to be true: People will continue to seek abortion care even when politicians put incredible barriers in their path,” Wales said.
Branding and marketing is the first recommendation listed in the task force’s 266-page report.
“It is the recommendation of the H.E.L.P. Task Force to create an Oklahoma life and parenting brand with a landing page from an Oklahoma website that compiles life and parenting resources, initiatives, programs, assistance and educational information to fulfill task force objectives, with the request for funding from Legislature, if needed,” the report states.
The task force also recommended:
Establishment of a statewide cooperative network and process for the availability of the “Abortion Pill Reversal,” in conjunction with area hospitals, clinics and pregnancy centers. Abortion pill reversal is a controversial use of progesterone to counter the effects of medication abortion. Opponents say the treatment is not supported by scientific evidence.
Exploration of a tax credit, similar to one in Missouri, for donations to certified pregnancy help centers.
Expansion of funding through the Choosing Childbirth Act, which supports organizations offering adoption, counseling and other social services programs for pregnant women.
Elimination of “unnecessary barriers” to adoption to make Oklahoma the most “adoption-friendly” state in the nation.
Expansion of health services for women in all areas of the state, noting that some areas are considered “maternity deserts.”
Expansion of SoonerCare, Oklahoma’s version of Medicaid, by raising the federal poverty level for income eligibility for pregnancy and postpartum coverage from 138% of the federal poverty level to 205% of the federal poverty level.
Extension of postpartum coverage for SoonerCare recipients from 60 days to 12 months.
Regarding the so-called abortion pill reversal, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists opposes the treatment.
“Claims regarding abortion ‘reversal’ treatment are not based on science and do not meet clinical standards,” the organization states on its website. “The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ranks its recommendations on the strength of the evidence and does not support prescribing progesterone to stop a medication abortion.”
While the group declined to comment to the Tulsa World on the HELP report, one member of the group did.
“Claims that progesterone may be used for abortion ‘reversal’ are not based on science, do not meet clinical standards, and are dangerous,” said Dr. Kristyn Brandi, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Darney-Landy fellow. “There have not been successful clinical trials of this treatment, and in fact one trial was stopped early due to serious hemorrhaging experienced by trial participants.
“ACOG does not support prescribing progesterone to stop a medication abortion. Unproven treatments interfere with patient safety and put the lives of pregnant people at risk. The recommendation of Oklahoma’s HELP Task Force to pursue a statewide effort to provide this unfounded abortion ‘reversal’ treatment will endanger pregnant people and force doctors to lie to their patients.”
The task force also recommended:
The Legislature should adopt national best practices and allow certified nurse-midwives to “practice at the top of their education and training.”
Considering a woman “at the point of a positive pregnancy test” to have a dependent and be eligible for federal financial assistance through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program.
The Legislature should amend state law to permit a TANF applicant with a positive drug test to qualify for the program provided they complete a substance abuse treatment plan and allow those treatment hours to count toward work activity requirements.
The Legislature should amend the Oklahoma Safe Haven Law to increase the number of days to relinquish a child without prosecution for child abandonment or child neglect from 30 days of age or younger to 60 days of age or younger.
The state should support the expansion of programs designed to promote fatherhood.
Rates of women voter registrations are surging—particularly where reproductive rights are threatened
Where rates of women voter registrations are surging
The Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade in June confirmed what many Americans already knew—that the highly polarizing issue of abortion would continue to divide people personally and politically. But the decision also had a less predictable outcome: Women have been registering to vote at very high rates in several conservative states where abortion access is either limited or practically nonexistent.
Across several states, the gender gap between men and women registering to vote ranged from 5% to 40% and was most pronounced in states where reproductive rights were most on the line. Meanwhile, states with more protections in place for abortion saw little to no uptick in women’s voter registrations.
While it’s too soon to say what impact this mobilization will have on midterm election results, some primary results may offer a glimpse of what’s to come. In Kansas, a proposed constitutional amendment to end the right to an abortion failed after voters decisively shot it down. And in New York, Democrat Pat Ryan won a congressional seat in a highly contested swing district after running a campaign centered on protecting abortion rights.
Stacker analyzed data from TargetSmart, a progressive data firm, to see how women’s voter registrations have changed since the Dobbs decision, which reversed decades of legal precedent protecting abortion. State rankings for legislation affecting abortion access are from the Guttmacher Institute.
Voters’ gender data is only collected using the labels ‘men’ and ‘women,’ meaning that it does not fully capture the extent to which people with nonbinary gender identities registered to vote. Similarly, abortion and reproductive rights impact more people than those who identify as women. For this article, “women” refers to people who marked that option on voter registration materials or whose state ID indicated that option.
You may also like: States that pay their politicians the most
Americans across the country broadly support access to abortion
Meanwhile, groups historically associated with the anti-abortion sentiment, like Catholics and more moderate Republicans, show majority support for legal abortion—a signal that views on the issue are changing.
Additional polling by the Kaiser Family Foundation in June 2022 indicates that two-thirds of Americans disapprove of the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. And Republican senators’ mixed reception of South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham’s proposed federal 15-week abortion ban points to a lack of consensus within the party about whether and under what circumstances abortion should be illegal.
In 10 swing states where there is majority support for legal abortion—to different extents—Republicans are running on campaigns that vary widely from opposition to Graham’s bill to full-throated support for it.
Women have been registering to vote at increased rates in states where abortion access is most threatened
According to TargetSmart CEO Tom Bonier, the U.S. has seen significant increases in the rates of women registering to vote since the Dobbs decision came out in June. In particular, these increases have been in states that have either entirely banned abortion or have implemented restrictions to make it difficult to access.
The states seeing the most significant increases in women registering to vote since the overturning of Roe are Kansas, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Ohio. This timing is no coincidence; there has also been an increase in women between 18 and 49 who report that abortion will be “very important” in their midterm voting decision-making.
Early results of the surge in voter registration are striking. In Kansas, where access to abortion is limited but still available, a vote resoundingly rejecting a proposed amendment to the state constitution that would have scrapped the right to abortion altogether prompted turnout numbers more comparable to a presidential election than a primary. This turnout was a stark repudiation of the movement to restrict abortion access further.
The defeat of the ballot measure, shot down by 59% of voters, came as a surprise to Kansas residents and those outside the largely conservative state. And it could be indicative of a potential nationwide shift in the decades-long partisanship surrounding the issue of abortion. While Kansas boasted the most dramatic increase in women registering to vote after the Dobbs decision, other states where access to abortion is on the line have also seen women substantially out-register men. On the other hand, states where abortion is already protected have not seen a specific uptick in women registering to vote.
Abortion and other issues have spurred enthusiasm from both parties ahead of midterms
Midterm polling and primary results indicate that Democrats and Republicans are motivated to vote in the upcoming election by different things. Democrats have been galvanized by the overturning of Roe v. Wade, leading to new voter registrations since Roe was overturned and naming abortion as a top issue this midterms season. Meanwhile, most GOP voters have indicated that economic concerns, like inflation, are their primary motivators.
Democrat and Republican voters are neck and neck regarding their reported enthusiasm for casting a vote in the midterm elections—65% of Republicans say they are “extremely” or “very” enthusiastic, while 62% of Democrats said the same. And while enthusiasm and new voter registrations don’t always translate into more votes on election day, they can cause ripple effects: voters may bring friends to the polls, knock on doors for candidates, or participate in other political initiatives.
More young people are also registering in states where abortion is salient
In addition to the rise in women registering to vote, young people, a group known for low voter turnout, have also registered at unusually high rates in states where abortion access is threatened. In Michigan, Kansas, Nevada, Colorado, and North Carolina, young people have registered to vote at rates surpassing the youth voter registration surge in 2018. Among younger voters, young women are out-registering young men.
In Kansas, over half of the women who registered to vote after the Supreme Court overturned Roe were younger than 25. However, the youngest class of voters, 18- and 19-year-olds who recently became eligible, have lagged behind other young voters.
What new registrations mean when it comes to election day and beyond
More significant numbers of women registering to vote may indicate increased support for Democratic candidates come election day, especially since women have historically turned out to vote at higher rates than men and are more likely to be Democrats. Still, Tom Bonier of TargetSmart is wary of making any concrete predictions.
“What we’re seeing is the entire political landscape changing. This is so, so different from trends in the past,” Bonier told Stacker. He acknowledged that registrations among young people also saw an uptick in 2018, particularly in response to the Parkland school shooting and the subsequent youth-led March For Our Lives movement. These registrations did eventually show up as higher turnout and increased early voting.
But voter registration rates amongst women and young people have outstripped even those of 2018’s midterm cycle. Abortion legislation, more than individual candidates, seems to have galvanized voters. “Elections where abortion is directly on the ballot, like Kansas, seem to be showing this impact,” Bonier said.
You may also like: Women politicians who broke barriers
https://tulsaworld.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/report-lauded-by-stitt-as-guide-for-oklahoma-on-pregnancy-care-also-draws-criticisms/article_91bcaac8-5c5c-11ed-be56-2ff0e3ae03cd.html
